我要展览
卓克艺术网>展览频道>从六里屯到三影堂
从六里屯到三影堂
从六里屯到三影堂
展览时间:2008/8/7-2008/10/7
展览城市:北京-北京
展览地点:
策展人:
主办单位:
协办单位:
查看所有大图

展会介绍

 
“从六里屯到三影堂”
 
巫鸿
 
 
《六里屯》可说是《荣荣的东村》的续编,东村解散之后,荣荣于1995年搬入离东村不远的六里屯,眼光和生活在变化,北京在扩张,一个用眼睛说话的日本女孩踏入小院,这是映里。从此她和荣荣,以及六里屯,在无声对话中找到意义。两年后,拆迁的巨轮碾过六里屯。当小院化为瓦砾,荣荣和映里手持白色鲜花,为小村的毁灭举行葬礼。
初见荣荣在六里屯。路上出租车突然停在路当中,大路戛然而止,柏油路面整齐切断,前面是绿油油的庄稼地。一霎间我忘记了自己身在何处——从没有不通到任何地方的路。恍惚像在梦中走到了世界的尽头,再往前一步就会从悬崖边坠落。我喃喃对自己说:“六里屯,北京尽头,世界尽头。”
看到荣荣的作品时,我知道对于他来说,六里屯的安静、懒散和疲惫实际上充满危机。有如台风中心的风眼,这种危机中的寂静使艺术家的神经格外敏锐,在紧张期待中审视一点一滴的现在,在无声中谛听着远方传来的啸音。于是这些所有没有时间感、不具意义的一切——残破的瓦房,褪色的窗棂,房檐下的浓阴,夏日正午知了的悠扬叫声——就都有了紧迫的时间感,都具有了特殊的意义。
这些作品标志着荣荣的“六里屯时代”的开始。这些照片是他在一个还没有被拆掉的院落中所创作的关于同类建筑的命运的照片,也是关于图像本身脆弱性的图像。与充满行动感和集体性的“东村时代”不同, “六里屯时代”标志了一个独立艺术家的诞生。对于荣荣来说,这种独立性反映在他对于死亡、悲剧和局限的反思和无奈。
虽能不时感到东村群体的回响,六里屯在变得越来越静谧和封闭,越来越像是艺术家的专业工作室,也越来越具有私人生活的隐私和暧昧。 “废墟”仍是荣荣摄影的主题,在画面中的女孩子仿佛是一个抽象的符号、仅在摄影中存在的幽灵般的形象。这个形象在映里出现才变为真实。在这之前的那些惆怅,在废墟中的徘徊,只不过是荣荣的期待。
映里在六里屯拍的是日常生活和零星感觉碎片,以“小样”的方式第一次公开呈现。没有剪裁也没有挑选,没有统一的空间和连贯的叙事,恒定因素是相机后面的映里的眼睛,好奇地观察着周围,但最多的是看入荣荣的眼睛和他的相机镜头:这些观察的碎片就是她不曾经验过、也不可能再次经验的生活。      
整个六里屯在2002年被夷为平地,荣荣和映里为这个地方举行的葬礼也是对自己生命中“六里屯时代”的告别。这个时代从荣荣发现“废墟”开始,以他和映里的相遇和结合结束。随着六里屯的消失,他们离开了这个不复存在的地方,走向没有边际的世界……
 
三.
我给《蜕》的最后一部分命名为“重生”,并在展览图录上注解:“一种关于美和青春的魔力是展览第三部分的决定性主题,展示了荣荣和映里在发现彼此并坠入爱河之后合作完成的两组作品。如同在废墟中重生,自然仍未受损,重新获得生命。两位摄影家拥抱这个令人惊叹的世界。和谐胜利了,斗争平息了。感官的愉悦重新成为艺术创作的主要目的;甚至连富士山冰冷刺骨的冬日图景中也充满了喜悦。”
早先在两位艺术家于2001年和2002年创作的宁静的摄影画面中所看到的“重生”,最终物化为他们对“三影堂”的创建(正式名称为三影堂摄影艺术中心,坐落于北京东郊的草场地)。三影堂完全由艺术家独立创办,4600平米的复合式空间承载了一个雄心勃勃的事业,设施包括两个巨大的展厅、会议厅、图书馆、暗房、咖啡厅,以及露天活动的空间。艾未未的设计为室内外空间进一步赋予更多的建筑重要性。2007年三影堂开幕之际,当作家Sheila Melvin采访我时,我告诉她这两位摄影家“做了意义重大的事。有那么多由企业或政府资助的博物馆和画廊,但我想这是第一个由艺术家自己资助的,而且是出于理想主义的动机。”关于由张黎和我一起策划的三影堂开幕展“新摄影——十年”,我又对Melvin说:“我建议做这个展览,是因为我认为他们首先应该建立一种历史性视角。同时我觉得中国发展这么快,中国的艺术家却并不经常思考。他们有天赋和雄心,但他们需要好好思考什么是中国当代摄影。”现在已是三影堂的第二年了,它已发展成为一个有丰富展览和教育计划的成熟机构,并开始广泛吸引国际的注意力。这不是荣荣和映里“重生”的唯一结果,通过建立三影堂,他们以大量的摄影记录了三影堂慢慢浮出北京冻土的过程,以及家庭的壮大:自六里屯时代起,他们已拥有了两个小孩,正在等待第三个小家伙的出世。
 
                                            2006年10月于芝加哥
 
 
From Six Mile Village to Three Shadows Studio
 
Wu Hung
 
 
A few years ago when I began writing Rong Rong’s East Village,[i] I wanted to discuss three things. While each of the three had its own distinct scope and theme, all were inseparable from understanding contemporary experimental art in China and the artists who practiced it. The first task was to interpret specific works of art, particularly to unearth the most interesting ones and explore their depths, as this is the basis of understanding any art or artist. The second task was to document and restore the artists’ living and working environment at that time, mainly by consolidating fragmentary information of their lived experience, emotion, and desire into a coherent picture. The third was to place these works and artists into the larger framework of contemporary Chinese urban, social, and cultural space. What was Rong Rong’s East Village? Why did he gather with other artists from far-flung reaches of the country in this small village on the periphery of Beijing, filled with garbage and industrial waste? What connection did they have to this place? What would be the fate of the East Village? Why did it disappear without a trace, leaving not even a broken brick or shattered tile to mark its presence? When I looked at the pictures of Rong Rong’s East Village and asked these questions, I hoped to understand—and indeed did gradually come to understand—not only the artistic nature of each photograph and the life experience of the photographer who made them, but also the fate of a city, the intimacy and struggle with which people inhabit their environments, and the uncontrollable tragedy of history.
       Photographs of Liulitun (literally, Six Mile Village) by Rong Rong and inri might be considered a continuation of Rong Rong’s East Village. The earliest works here were created shortly after the East Village artist community was disbanded, and Rong Rong moved to the nearby village of Liulitun in 1995. Writing this brief essay, I am still thinking of the three perspectives mentioned above: artworks, the artist, the city. As time passes by, Liulitun leads us step-by-step through the last years of the twentieth century, and on into the twenty-first. We see how Rong Rong’s lens and life gradually evolve, and how Beijing’s merciless expansion—that massive wheel of destruction and reconstruction—keeps on turning. At the dawn of the century, a Japanese girl who speaks with her eyes enters into this strange, small courtyard; she is inri. From this point on, she and Rong Rong and Liulitun find meaning in a soundless dialogue. Two years later, the wheel of destruction encroaches, finally crushing Liulitun. When their courtyard was turned into a pile of bricks, Rong Rong and Inri held a private funeral atop the ruins, holding fresh white flowers in their hands.
 
§
 
       I first met Rong Rong in Liulitun. It was the summer of 1997, when I was preparing the exhibition Transience: Experimental Chinese Art at the End of the 20th Century.[ii] One major goal of this exhibition was to shift the focus of the introductory research then being done on Chinese contemporary art from collectivity to individuality. As I saw it, this transition was of utmost importance for the exhibitions of this art then being mounted abroad, because for most foreign critics and viewers at that time, Chinese contemporary art, regardless of whether it was called “avant-garde,” “experimental,” “unofficial,” or “underground,” was unfailingly seen as a collective political behavior, meaningless outside the context of the post-Cultural Revolution political environment inside China or the post-Cold War international situation. Transience sought rather to portray Chinese contemporary art as a collection of individual artistic voices. This individuality, of course, was not isolated or absolute, because these artists did indeed face similar political, social, and artistic questions. But they were “experimental artists” precisely because each one reacted differently to a set of common questions and problems, resulting in creation and innovation in terms of form, style, and visual language. This idea of individuality became the center of the exhibition and the theme of its catalogue. For the catalogue, I wrote twenty-two short essays exploring the work of individual artists; the material for these articles came from my interviews with the artists as well as their notes, writings, plans, and drawings. I did some of these interviews at the Overseas Chinese Hotel (the place where I most liked to stay when I came back to China in those years), but I also felt it important to see the artists in the spaces where they lived and worked. And that is why I went to visit Rong Rong in Liulitun.
       Even after many years, I remember that visit like it was yesterday. Rong Rong described to me the rough location of Liulitun over the phone, outside the Third Ring Road, close to the Fourth Ring then under construction. He would wait for me by the roadside. With this in mind I hired a cab and had it drive straight east along Agricultural Exhibition Center South Road. The road was newly constructed: flat, broad, empty. The cab passed the Second Ring, then the Third, as the tall buildings grew scarcer. Workers were erecting traffic lights and electric poles along the street; sluggish pedestrians waddled across. The cab suddenly stopped in the middle of the road, when the driver turned around and said, “No way to go on, no more road.” I got out and looked around, and indeed things were as he said. The road ended under my feet, the pavement stopped, in front of me only bright green cropland. For just an instant I forgot where I was: I have never had another experience like this—no matter what the road, it always leads somewhere. There are no roads to nowhere. I felt absentminded, as if in a dream I had wandered to the edge of the world, where going one step forward would mean falling off a cliff. Snapping out of it, I asked the driver to turn the car around and drive slowly back. Less than a hundred meters back, Rong Rong was standing by the side of the road, his long hair blowing in the wind. I mumbled to myself, “Liulitun, the end of Beijing, the end of the world.”
       This feeling of being at the end of the world grew deeper as the afternoon went on. Rong Rong led me off the empty road, down a bumpy dirt road into a little village, and finally to his small courtyard. In those five minutes I was taken back to days twenty or thirty years before, back into the recesses of my familiar, endless, eternally recurring past. No one knows how old this past is: humble brick and tile homes, faded latticework, deep shadows under overhanging eaves, the rising and falling chirp of cicadas at high noon. It is as if these have always been and always will be. But in 1997, this feeling of safety and permanence was but an illusion. As soon as I saw Rong Rong’s work, I immediately realized that for him, the quiet laziness and exhaustion of Liulitun were full of crisis. Yet like the eye of a storm, the tranquility at the heart of this crisis had made the artist’s nerves all the more sensitive, observing every drop of the present amidst this anxious state of waiting, listening in silence to the clamor moving in from afar. Thus this feeling of timelessness, this state of meaninglessness—the humble homes and faded latticework, the eaves and their shadows, the chirping noontime cicadas—was endowed with a biting sense of time, a special significance.
       That day Rong Rong showed me his series Untitled, which I have since referred to as “ruin pictures.” This name has several meanings for me. On one level, “ruin pictures” expresses the ascendance and scale of demolition in Beijing. In these pictures, tiled buildings and courtyard dwellings have been transformed into desolate, dilapidated piles. The former occupants have moved on, and the images retain the tranquility of a cemetery. But on another level, these photographs also represent “ruined image”: the central image in each picture is a leftover poster amidst the rubble, often faded portraits of glamorous movie stars. Another related group of works frees the theme of ruin images from the realities of architecture altogether: these are images displayed in public settings, faded and damaged by the bright sun. I have already written of these works in articles and books, but here I would like to add one more point: these works marked the beginning of Rong Rong’s “Liulitun Moment.” They are photos about the fate of buildings like the then still-undemolished one in which he lived, and about the fundamental fragility of the image itself. Unlike the collective nature of the “East Village Moment,” this “Liulitun Moment” belonged to an independent artist. For Rong Rong, this independence is reflected in meditations about death, tragedy, and limitation.
 
§
 
I would visit Liulitun many more times, going to see Rong Rong’s new work and that of the other artists living in that courtyard. Although at times one could still feel the echoes of the earlier East Village—gatherings of friends eating and drinking together, debating the world, the occasional performance by one artist or another—still the atmosphere of that courtyard grew ever quieter and more closed. Little by little it became the living and working space of a single artist, filled with the secrets and ambiguities of a private life. The ivy on the gate grew thicker, the sounds of cars and people outside seemed to grow more and more remote. “Ruins” remained a theme in Rong Rong’s photography, but each new work grew in refinement and size, as their content likewise grew more romantic and theatrical. He had always liked to photograph himself, and was now filling the twin roles of director and actor. Some of these new photographs were hand colored, bearing traces of their author’s participation in the post-production process. These changes resulted in the series Wedding Veil and Ghost Village.
These are two exceptionally beautiful series, which portray decay and melancholy through images of a young man and woman wandering atop ruins, like songs without words. I can pick Rong Rong out of every image, whether he is naked or dressed in the bright cloak of a woman. But I had never met the girl who appeared with him, and so she has remained for me an abstract symbol, a ghost-like image existing only in the photographs. This image became real only at the moment when inri appeared. Then I understood. The melancholy that came before, the hesitation amidst the ruins—all were but expressions of Rong Rong’s expectation.
Perhaps that was in 2000, when we—my wife Judith, my daughter Lida, and I—became Rong Rong and inri’s friends. It was all so natural. She appeared in that courtyard in Liulitun, bearing the lightest tea on a small tray, smiling. “Tea,” she said (in her newly acquired Chinese). Then, turning to face the lazy cat roaming the courtyard, she smiled and said, “Cat.” But the pictures she made while in Tokyo allowed me to know the pre-Liulitun inri. That was a time of colorless pupils and convulsing bodies staring out of black-and-white photographs, a brilliant feminine face struggling toward collapse, shadowy urban spectacles of Tokyo emerging under streetlamps. There was no substance or weight, just the anticipation and anxiety before the climax and the weightlessness and collapse that followed.
These works are utterly different from the photographs she produced while living in Liulitun. The latter consist of innumerable fragments of daily life and piecemeal emotion, presented openly for the first time as galley proofs in an exhibition in New York’s Chamber Fine Arts in 2006.[iii] The vertical and horizontal rows of images have not been cut or edited. There is no spatial coherence or sequential narrative; the only constant is the eye behind the camera, that of inri, curiously observing the extent of her surroundings, and focusing mostly on Rong Rong, his eyes, his camera. I can understand why inri has not made these proofs into individual artworks, placing them into exquisite frames: these fragments are just her life, a life she had never before experienced and will never again experience.
These photographs also make me understand more deeply the last series of works in that exhibition: when their courtyard was razed to the ground along with all of Liulitun in 2002, Rong Rong and inri held a funeral for this place and a farewell to the “Liulitun Moment” in their own lives. This moment began when Rong Rong discovered “ruins” and ended with his encounter and union with inri. Once Liulitun had disappeared, they left this place that would never again exist, moving into a world without end. A batch of works reflecting youth and full of desire for beauty had been produced, marking a new transcendence. In my imagination, this transcendence is like that of the spring cicadas climbing arduously out of the ground, bit by bit up the trunks of tall trees, shedding their shells, and finally flying off into the blue sky. For this reason, when I curated their two-person show in the Great Furnace Room of Beijing’s Factory 798 in September 2003, I chose the name Tui-transfiguration as a poetic expression of this process of transcendence, and as a remembrance and recollection of their bygone days in the East Village, Tokyo, and Liulitun.
 
§
 
I titled the last part of the Tui-transfiguration “Rebirth,” and commented on it in the exhibition catalogue: “A fascination with beauty and youth is the dominant theme of the third section of the exhibition, which feature two groups of collaborative works that Rong Rong and inri created after they had found each other and fallen in love. As if reborn from ruins, nature, still unspoiled, comes back to life. The two photographers embrace this amazing world. Harmony has triumphed, struggle has subsided. Sensual pleasure has returned to become the main purpose for artistic creation; even the frozen, frightening winter landscape of Mt. Fuji inspires joy.”[iv]
First seen in the tranquil photographic images that these two artists created together in 2001 and 2002, this rebirth finally materialized in their founding of Sanyingtang---the Three Shadows Studio (the formal name is the Three Shadows Photography Art Center) at Caochangdi on the east edge of Beijing. Solely funded by themselves, this 4,600 sq meters complex is an ambitious undertaking with facilities including two large exhibition halls, a conference room, a library, darkrooms, a café, and spaces for outdoor activities. Ai Weiwei’s design further bestows the central building and surrounding yards with additional architectural significance. When the writer Sheila Melvin interviewed me in 2007 upon the Center’s opening, I told her that these two artists "have done something quite important. There are so many museums and galleries sponsored by companies or governments, but I think this is the first sponsored by artists---and for idealistic reasons."[v] About the first exhibition the Center organized, called New Photo---Ten Years and co-curated by Zhang Li and me, I told Melvin again: "I suggested this show because I felt they first should establish a historical perspective. I also feel that China moves so fast that the artists don't always think---they have instinct and ambition, but they need to think about what is Chinese contemporary photography."[vi] Now in its second year, Sanyingtang has developed into a mature institution with a varied exhibition and education program, and has begun to attract wide attention internationally. This is not the only result of Rong Rong’s and inri’s rebirth, however: with the founding of the Sanyingtang they have also created a large body of photographs recording its emergence from Beijing’s frozen earth, as well as the expansion of their family: since the Liulitun Moment they have given birth to two children and are awaiting the third.
 
(This essay is partially translated by Philip Tinari.)
 
 

客服电话:18156032908 18155173028 18956011098

©2005-2018 zhuoke.cn ICP皖ICP备09018606号-1