我要展览
卓克艺术网>展览频道>想·象重生——平实艺术第二回展
想·象重生——平实艺术第二回展
想·象重生——平实艺术第二回展
展览时间:2008/4/5-2008/4/20
展览城市:北京-北京
展览地点:
策展人:
主办单位:
协办单位:
查看所有大图

展会介绍

     2008年4月5日——4月20日,由中国美术馆韩劲松策划,0工场艺术中心主办的“想·象重生”展在北京798艺术区0工场艺术中心举办。这是0工场装修改造后的首个开放展。当今艺术状态下架上平面创作面临太多的直白与简单图解等想象力匮乏的问题,画家做的是一篇社会规定的命题作文,社会学汹涌而至,以文害义。基于此,提出“想·象重生”试图重新思考画家的主体定位及其表达的话语方式。“想”是一种内在驱动,构成语言行为的价值主体,体现为“我想我在”。其超越性注定了它与现实世界的远,既不拿现象说事,亦不同于近距离和图像学。“想”可以致广大、尽幽微,天马行空,繁花入梦,因此画中有诗。“象”是“想”的视觉形式的表达,象立意尽。本展览参展的8位艺术家:刘欣、闫振强、徐松波、胡李海、杜江岩、马铁明、刘世健、牛敏就是在这个命题下集中起来的作风稳健、从容面对内心真实的整体,在“想·象”的关系模式中他们各自以其入境之“想”和可玩味之“象”重张绘画美学品质,回归生命本真自性,精彩可以想象。
韩劲松

 

Thinking·Regeneration of Images
——the 2nd “Ping·Shi” Art Exhibition
The age of pictures has destroyed man’s ability of thinking. The creation originates from picture and ends in picture. The men who surrounded by pictures are unable to refuse them and are also unable to think. Those skills of simplified symbol-joint, shifting, joking imitation and juxtaposition are abused excessively. The art works have therefore become vulgar diagrams of sociological theories. The artists are confused insignificant skills as their “I.D cards”. They are feeling selves-satisfied and, inciting by noises of the theories, want to insist on obstinately to the end. In any case, excessive colloquialism and simplistic reflection led to the lack of imagination. It has become a problem that everyone is an artist but everybody a phony artist.

The title “Thinking·Regeneration of Images” is put forwards by reason of reconsideration that what a painter’s subjectivity and his express pattern are. “Thinking” is a psychological ability and also a system sustaining language. Its transcendence destined the distance between it and realistic world. The spirituality of so called “transcendence of this life” or “metaphysics” has entrusted to itself romantic poetry, and it is thereby different from the “new generation” who are flat and insipid because of the close distance as well as the pictorial paintings. “Thinking” may expand to boundless and has a most fantastic idea which including total feeling, thinking and connection. It is a free thought and its subjectivity is the idiom “I think therefore I am”, namely an independent personality. The “Image” means seal, characters, speeches and pictures that are material expression of the “thought”. It embodies a visional form in a painting, and expresses meaning while it is established. In the model of “thinking·image”, we stress the former. Although the men have to response stimulation of the modern world, an artist needs the personality of “thinking” in order to avoid submergence of “me” by external world. It should be that the artists who get together in the exhibition posses separately their deep “thinking” and pondering “images”.

Imaging landscapes——Art works by Liu Xin, Yan Zhenqiang, Xu Songbo, Liu Shijian and Niu Min express undetermined mental scenes. Liu Xin’s works contain flavor of metropolitan fashion and however not reduction of reality but decrease of material trace. He goes beyond a popular expression of life sentiment. The beauty gradually varies towards as a metropolitan mirage that is fictitiousness, plane and patterning. The man is abstracted as merely an outer form floating like a dissociating shadow. The landscapes of mountain and water, painted by Yan Zhenqiang, convey a classic perception. The painter merely studies into landscape with ink and color that therefore attracts attention. He has a good grounding in basic skills of bi-mo (brush and ink). Recently Yan has try to develop into skills of green and thick colors by which might take a turn for a vivid composition. The tableaus of landscape open a pure space by which people might long for a transcend world. These compositions come from rather nature than the heart. Xu Songbo’s works are about the allegories of which individual spirit breaking through the barrier of contemporary society. The painter concentrates not on exposing the unharmonious situation but on reviving, through transform and docking, a forgotten historic memory in order to carry forward the lost spirit of nationality. He imagines that mounted troops of Han and Tang dynasties are galloping upon the ruins of post-industry era. This kind of encounter brings about a fantastic feeling that the military accomplishments overspread the agony caused by conflicts of civilizational evolution. It’s interested that Xu Songbo constructed by realistic means a fantastic space which looks very true, and therefore convincible and dramatic. Liu Shijian is sensitive to confusion and disorder of modern society. He wants start from his own cultural experience to sort out a direct pictographic clue to both tradition and modern. The painter shifts the pictures as his pleases, and weaves them a net of narration which are filled with ridicules. Still, the sketch by Niu Min is depiction of dreams with graceful and restrained sentiment, such as in the misty rain.

The feeling-expressible life——works by Hu Lihai, Du Jiangyan and Ma Tieming belong to live entity which are different from those landscapes. The landscape is a subjective throw which directly expresses feeling and, by form of equal structure, points to the original intention itself. The paintings by Hu Lihai have scorching hot that each brush holds continuing consciousness and flowing tension. No matter what scribbling or dyeing colors, all his means turned into spiritual patterns pouring desire, agony and love over the canvas. It let us believed that a painting form is by no mean artificial production but the life itself in the experience. Only in the form of language the truth of life release easily. Hu Lihai’s paintings express inner disappearing and meditation. Du Jiang’s paintings express tragedy-like anxiousness and disturbance by nervous lines, distort shapes which displaying inner commotion. Ma Tieming’s paintings show an imposing manner of walking or standing between heaven and earth. The landscapes reflect totally his inner   grand scenes. Like the former two painters, Ma is able to hold effective strength and grasps the entirety that showing life vividly.

A pure form——The styles of Xie Tian and Zheng Genhao are characterized by pure form in pattern, colors and materials which are different from those of the formers two styles. Their works are just the works themselves that challenging to imagination by means of the cool thinking. Xie Tian constructed his own painting language by thick colors with denseness, gorgeousness and vagueness. Zheng Genhao is well known the materials and comprehends their functions in creation of modern conception, including recognition of physical quality and artificial nature. The understanding aroused enthusiasm for experiment of materials. A lot of works are made in recent years and opened a realm of which is more abstract, more pure and more essential.

By means of different languages, the 10 artists mentioned above explained their imaging art and their imaginations about art. It’s believed that they and their works might bring us more enlightenment.


Han Jinsong
Oct., 23, 2007

想·象重生——平实艺术第二回展
图像时代摧毁了人的想的能力,创作源于图像,止于图像,被图像包围了的人们在图像面前无力拒绝也无力思想,简单的符号化拼贴、挪用、戏拟、并置被反复利用、遍地开花,使得艺术作品已经变成了社会学理论的庸俗图解。或者沉迷于带有身份识别性质的雕虫小技之中沾沾自喜,更在理论话语的鼓噪下大有偏执到底的气势。不管怎样,太多的直白与简单反映使绘画中想象力的缺失成为一个问题,人人都是艺术家,人人都成了空头艺术家。“想·象重生”的提出基于这一点,试图重新思考画家的主体性定位及其表达的话语方式。“想”是一种心理活动能力,构成了语言行为的支持系统,“想”的超越性注定了它与现实世界的远,所谓“即世的超然”或者叫“形而上”,这种精神上的特征赋予它浪漫主义的诗性色彩,不同于新生代的近距离和图像绘画的索然寡味。“想”的广大可以无地无域,无边无形,思接千载,心游万仞,异想天开,迁想妙得。包括有所感(感想)和有所思(思想)有所系(联想),此谓自由思想。而它的主体性则体现为“我想,故我在”此谓独立人格——“这远方的太阳/深渊的火/精神寒爽/独自灿烂”。 “象”则是纹章、文字、言语、图像,是“想”的物质形式的表达,在绘画中落实为一幅作品的视觉形式,象立意尽。在“想·象”的关系模式中我们强调“想”,因为尽管现代社会刺激着人们从各个方面做出反应,个体的处境与情感不断发生变化,不断遭到外部世界的挤压和灌输,但一个艺术家仍然要具有“想”的品质,能“想”且“想得开”,而不仅仅是从A到A的工具化的镜像复制,如此才不致辱没了“我”。本展览在这个命题下集中起来的艺术家们,应该说各有其入境之“想”和可玩味之“象”。
想象的风景——刘欣、阎振强、徐松波、刘世健、牛敏、凤胤斐的作品表现了不确定的心理时空场景。刘欣的作品带有都市时尚的气息,但并非还原现实,而是尽量消减物质的痕迹,审美上也超越了满足一般化的生活情趣的表述,使美逐渐变异,直至发展为虚拟的、平面化、图案化的都市蜃景,人被抽空了本质,剩下符号的躯壳魅影漂浮游离于纠缠不清的心灵困局。阎振强的溪山胜景也许给人古典的感觉,在标榜现代的语境中,他只研朱墨作春山,不禁让人瞩目。他有很好的笔墨功底,近年在尝试着向青碧重彩发展,这种转向带来生机,画面营构出的山水园林敞开了一片纯净的空间让人起出世之远思,这些画面的得来与其说来自自然,不如说是妙造自然,从心所出。徐松波的作品是关于个体精神冲出当代社会樊篱的寓言,其着眼点不在于揭示不和谐状,而是试图从古今时空的转换对接中复活一种被遗忘了的历史记忆、以此张扬民族失落的精神价值。在他的想象中,汉唐盛世的铁马兵骑长驱直入,凌空驾临后工业时代的废墟之上,它们的相遇产生一种奇幻感,英雄武功的感召力掩盖了文明进化带来的的冲突隐痛。有意思的是徐松波依靠写实的手段给我们营造了一个特别真实的空间幻景,增加了他的言说的说服力与戏剧效果。刘世健一直敏感于当代社会混乱无序的现实,从自身的文化经验出发试图梳理并解析出一条直观的通达传统与现代的图像线索,之后他则任意调动这些图像线索结成画面的叙事之网,而其叙述的语气则充满揶揄和调侃。牛敏的小品具有婉约情调,烟雨迷蒙,若即若离,描绘的仍然是梦境的一角。凤胤斐的作品把岩彩的绚丽发挥到极致,大面积的色彩铺张肆意刺戳着我们的视神经,其画中人物却鲜艳褪去,隐约于图底变换的游戏之中,如痴如醉,越想逃离却越让人沉迷。
纵情的生命——胡李海、杜江沿、马铁明的作品属于生命体(裁),与风景体(裁)不同的是,风景体是经过了主体意志的外部投射过程,生命体直抒胸臆,通过异质同构的形式直指本心,来势凶猛和强悍,无需赘述,这就是表现的本质。胡李海的画有灼热之感,每一笔都蕴含了意识的绵延与时态的流动,不管涂抹还是堆叠抑或渲染,所有机关手段都化为精神的羽翼,生之欲与痛与爱尽泻于画布。这让我们相信,一幅画的形式不是人为创造出来的,生命存在本身即具有某种可体验的形式,只是在语言状态里,生命的真实更容易找到释放的出口。如果说胡李海的画尚有内敛、冥想的气质,那么杜江沿就是焦虑的、骚动的、悲剧式的。紧张的线条、扭曲的造型、墨气森森,气象诡秘,显示出内心的不安。马铁明的画很有气势,纵笔天地之间,天地与我为一、万物与我并生,风景反映的完全是内心的大场面。像前两位一样,他的可贵在于能抓到画的有生力量,闪念之间一气呵成,整体把握好,画得鲜活又能传出神韵。
纯粹的形式——郑根浩以纯粹形式自处,他的作品在形态、色彩、材质诸多语言要素的运用上显然有异于前两种,不在作品以外寻求表现内容,作品就是作品,这反而以其思维的严酷对想象提出挑战,必须无中生有,自设自叙,自在自为,否则将于事无补。郑根浩凭着多年对材料的熟谙形成了他对材料在现代创造理念中特殊作用的理解,其中包括了对材料的物理性与人工性的认识,这激发了材料试验的热情,几年中所作的大量作品,以独特的材质美感和形式结构开辟了一种更加抽象、纯粹、本质的语言境界。
以上十位艺术家以不同的语言方式诠释了想象的艺术和艺术的想象,相信他们的作品能带给我们更多的启示。
韩劲松

2007年10月23日

上一篇展览:身份--沈沁水墨,张卫国油画展

下一篇展览:Tales from Venice

客服电话:18156032908 18155173028 18956011098

©2005-2018 zhuoke.cn ICP皖ICP备09018606号-1